检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵峥[1] 常含笑 ZHAO Zheng;CHANG Hanxiao(Institute of Public Administration and Human Resources,Development Research Center of the State Council,Beijing 100010,China;School of Politics and International Studies,University of Leeds,Leeds LS29JT,United Kingdom)
机构地区:[1]国务院发展研究中心公共管理与人力资源研究所,北京100010 [2]利兹大学政治与国际研究学院,利兹LS29JT
出 处:《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》2024年第8期1-6,共6页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
摘 要:城市数字治理是数字技术嵌入,重塑城市治理体系,强化城市治理能力的过程。作为一个理论与政策实践相结合的重要命题,研究城市数字治理问题不仅要考虑其自身蕴含的学理逻辑,也要能够反映国情现实并体现政策导向。通过构建“目标—行动—保障”的城市数字治理逻辑框架,分析城市数字治理存在公共服务领域的“数字技术偏见”风险、组织实施领域的“数字技术依赖”风险和行为规范领域的“数字技术滥用”风险,提出统筹“总量”与“结构”、“工具”与“人为”、“法治”与“伦理”,提升城市数字治理的服务水平、协同水平和规范水平的优化策略。Urban digital governance is the process of embedding digital technology,reshaping the urban governance system,and strengthening urban governance capabilities.As an important proposition that combines theory with policy practice,studying urban digital governance issues should not only refer to the theoretical logic inherent in it,but also reflect the reality of national conditions and policy orientation.This article constructs a logical framework of Goal—Action—Security for urban digital governance,analyzing the risks of digital technology bias in the field of public services,digital technology dependence in the field of organizational implementation,and digital technology abuse in the field of behavioral norms in urban digital governance,and proposes optimization strategies to coordinate“total amount”and“structure”,“tools”and“human”,“rule of law”and“ethics”,and improve the service level,collaborative level,and normative level of urban digital governance.
关 键 词:城市数字治理 “目标—行动—保障”逻辑框架 风险情景 优化策略
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49