检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳建闽[1] 石林红 LIU Jianmin;SHI Linhong(School of Public Administration and Law,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China)
机构地区:[1]福建农林大学公共管理与法学院,福建福州350002
出 处:《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期126-132,共7页Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
摘 要:种子是农业的芯片,植物新品种权是保护育种创新的一项重要知识产权,而非法代繁侵权行为是侵害植物新品种权的一种典型行为。对最高人民法院发布的种业知识产权典型案例之一——(2020)最高法知民终428号案件分析发现,我国司法实践过程中仍然存在侵权主体混杂、行为隐蔽、取证困难和赔偿数额认定难等复杂问题。因此,需通过行政和司法合力保护、科学分配举证责任、法定赔偿和惩罚性赔偿相结合的完善对策来纾解困境。Seeds are the chips of agriculture.The plant variety right is an important intellectual property right for the protection of breeding innovation,while illegal breeding is a typical behavior of infringing the right.Through an analysis of Judgment No.428(2020),one of the typical cases of intellectual property rights in the seed industry issued by the Supreme People's Court,it is found that in the course of China's judicial practice,there are still some complex problems such as mixed subjects of infringement,hidden behaviors,difficulties in obtaining evidence and difficulties in determining the amount of compensation.Therefore,it is necessary to tackle these problems through the countermeasures such as administrative and judicial protection,appropriate allocation of the burden of proof,and the combination of statutory and punitive damages.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.23