犯罪附随后果准用制度的构建  

On the Application System of Criminal Consequences

作　　者：谷永超[1] 张恒飞 Gu Yongchao;Zhang Hengfei(School of Law,Henan University,Kaifeng Henan 475001,China)

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《衡阳师范学院学报》2024年第4期73-82,共10页Journal of Hengyang Normal University

基　　金：河南省高校人文社会科学研究一般项目“扫黑除恶专项斗争中涉案财产处理实证研究”(2022-ZZJH-012)。

摘　　要：在轻罪时代,犯罪附随后果的适用受到来自犯罪分子人身危险性普遍降低和附随后果内容缺乏合理性两方面的挑战。犯罪附随后果的预防功能和人权保障的价值归正,要求对犯罪附随后果的适用作进一步调整。犯罪附随后果准用制度的本质是严格控制犯罪附随后果的适用,其构建要以犯罪附随后果的内容优化为前提,以较大人身危险性的判断为核心,以合理的适用原则为准绳,以科学的程序设计与救济机制为保障。与前科消灭、犯罪记录封存和复权制度相比,犯罪附随后果准用制度有明确、保护和彻底三方面的优越性。In the era of misdemeanors,the application of the accompanying consequences of crimes is challenged by two aspects:the generally reduced personal danger of criminals and the lack of rationality in the content of accompanying consequences.The restoration of the preventive function of the consequences of crime and the value of human rights protection requires further adjustments to the ap⁃plication of the consequences of crime.The essence of the system for the application of criminal incidental consequences is to strictly control the application of criminal incidental consequences.Its construction should be based on the optimization of the content of crimi⁃nal incidental consequences,with the judgment of greater personal danger as the core,reasonable application principles as the criteri⁃on,and scientific program design and rescue mechanisms as the guarantee.Compared with the system of eliminating criminal records,sealing criminal records,and restoring rights,the system of allowing the use of criminal consequences has three advantages:clarity,pro⁃tection,and thoroughness.

关 键 词：准用制度 人身危险性 预防功能 人权保障 轻罪治理 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]