贿赂犯罪刑罚配置的立法检视--以《刑法修正案(十二)》为视角的分析  

Legislative Review on the Punishment Configuration of Bribery Crimes--An Analysis from the Perspective of Amendment(XII)to the Criminal Law

作　　者：何立荣[1] 叶子俊 HE Lirong;YE Zijun(Law School,Guangxi Minzu University,Nanning,Guangxi 530000,China)

机构地区：[1]广西民族大学法学院,广西南宁530000

出　　处：《沧州师范学院学报》2024年第3期104-109,132,共7页Journal of Cangzhou Normal University

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(十二)》对于贿赂犯罪刑罚配置的修改充分贯彻了“坚持受贿行贿一起查”的反腐败方略,加大惩治单位受贿罪的力度,注重单位行贿罪的刑期均衡,并进一步完善了行贿犯罪规制体系。但对其进行立法检视,不难发现在修法中也存在一些非理性之处将会导致司法适用上的困惑,具体表现为财产刑的误用或缺失、刑罚适用的僵化以及罪与罪之间惩治力度不协调等问题。在应对路径上,可以通过取消对国有非企业单位的罚金刑配置,调整行贿犯罪“必并科”财产刑的立法模式,协调行贿罪与特定关联犯罪的刑罚配置,在非国家工作人员受贿罪中增设没收财产刑来解决当前面临的问题。The amendment(XII)to the Criminal Law fully implements the anti-corruption strategy of“adhering to the joint investigation of bribery and bribery”in the punishment of bribery crimes,increases the intensity of punishing unit bribery crimes,pays attention to the balance of the sentence of unit bribery crimes,and further improves the regulatory system of bribery crimes.However,upon legislative review,it is not difficult to find that there are also some irrational aspects in the revision of the law that will lead to confusion in judicial application,specifically manifested as the misuse or absence of property penalties,the rigidity of penalty application,and the lack of coordination in punishment between crimes.On the response path,the current problems can be solved by canceling the fine penalty allocation for state-owned and non enterprise units,adjusting the legislative model of“mandatory merger of property penalties”for bribery crimes,coordinating the penalty allocation for bribery crimes and specific related crimes,and adding the confiscation of property penalty in the bribery crimes of non-state employees.

关 键 词：贿赂犯罪 立法检视 刑罚配置 《刑法修正案(十二)》 

分 类 号：D924.392[政治法律—刑法学]