检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴芯懿 DAI Xinyi(Guangdong University of Foreign Studies Center for European Studies,Guangzhou Guangdong,510420,China)
机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学欧洲研究中心,广东广州510420
出 处:《四川体育科学》2024年第4期73-78,共6页Sichuan Sports Science
摘 要:本文主要以欧盟15个成员国国家队为例,分析欧洲一体化对其国家队发展的影响。在一体化进程中,欧盟机构第一次也是唯一一次以欧盟法的“硬手段”(hardtool)改变了足球管理机构的决策,强迫足球管理机构促成了博斯曼法案的通过。以博斯曼法案为切入点,建DID模型后发现:博斯曼法案实现了拥有欧盟公民身份的球员在转会市场内自由流动,间接地降级了国家队在FIFA的排名。最后得出初步结论,欧洲一体化没有给15个欧盟成员国国家队带来正面影响。This paper mainly takes the national teams of 15 EU Member States as an example to analyze the impact of European integration on the development of their national teams.In the process of European integration,EU institutions changed the decision-making of football management institutions with the "hard tool" of EU law,forcing football management institutions to pass the Bosman Ruling for the first time.After taking the Bosman Ruling as the breakthrough point and building the DID model,it is found that the Bosman Ruling achieves the free flow of players with EU citizenship in the transfer market and indirectly demotes the national team's ranking in FIFA.Finally,it draws a preliminary conclusion that the European integration has not brought a positive impact on the national teams of the 15EU Member States.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.242.51