检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟静 蓝柳冰[1] ZHONG Jing;LAN Liu-bing(Meizhou People's Hospital,Meizhou 514031,Guangdong)
出 处:《安徽医专学报》2024年第4期117-119,共3页Journal of Anhui Medical College
基 金:梅州市科技计划项目(编号:2023B38)。
摘 要:目的:通过对多个研究进行Meta分析,明确各种治疗方式对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖、尿酸的影响。方法:通过文献检索数据库,收集有关不同治疗方式对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖、尿酸影响的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。采用RevMan软件行Meta分析。结果:经筛选,共纳入7篇研究,均为RCT。共包括822例妊娠期糖尿病孕妇,其中接受常规胰岛素治疗的411例,接受其他方法治疗的411例。研究组干预期空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、尿酸均明显降低(P<0.01)。结论:不同治疗方式对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖和尿酸水平有显著影响。采用其他方法治疗可能有更好的影响效果。Objective:To investigate the effects of different treatments on blood glucose and uric acid in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM)by Meta-analysis.Methods:A literature search database was used to collect Randomized controlled trial and observational studies on the effects of different treatments on blood glucose and uric acid in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software.Results:after screening,7 studies were included,all of them were RCT.A total of 822 pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM)were included,including 411 who received conventional insulin therapy and 411 who received other therapies.In the study group,fasting blood glucose,2-hour postprandial blood glucose and uric acid were significantly reduced(P<0.01).Conclusion:different treatment methods have significant effects on blood glucose and uric acid levels in GDM pregnant women.Other treatments may have a better effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.166.126