对司法智能化应用局限性的观察与思考———以民事司法智能化应用为中心  

Observations and Reflections on the Limitations of the Judicial Intelligentized Application:Centered on the Intelligentized Application of Civil Justice

作　　者：张卫平[1] 冉博 Zhang Weiping;Ran Bo

机构地区：[1]东南大学 [2]东南大学法学院

出　　处：《财经法学》2024年第5期94-108,共15页Law and Economy

基　　金：2023年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“执行法典化背景下的债务人异议之诉体系化研究”(23BFX138)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：司法智能化在我国司法实践中已经得到较为广泛的应用,并且随着人工智能技术的发展,司法智能化的实践将更加普及和丰富。司法智能化的运用对于提高司法的效率以及公正性都具有重要的意义,但也应当意识到司法智能化的运用也存在着若干局限,必须对此有充分的认识,以免其盲目扩张和极端化,导致对既有制度发展和完善的抑制和阻碍。从目前司法智能的运行实践来看,其局限性主要体现在以下几个方面:第一,司法智能化大数据运用与案件审判中因果关系的龃龉;第二,司法智能化对司法自由裁量的弱化;第三,司法智能化运用中司法政策适用的困境;第四,司法智能化运用中政治、伦理等因素考量的障碍。Judicial intelligence in China s judicial practice has been more widely applied,and the practice of judicial intelligence will be more popular and rich with the development of artificial intelligence technology.The use of judicial intelligence is of great significance to improve the efficiency and fairness of justice,but we should also realize that the use of judicial intelligence has a number of limitations,which requires us to have a full understanding of its limitations,so as to avoid its blind expansion and polarization,for fear of resulting in inhibition and obstacles to the development and improvement of the established system.Judging from the current operation practice of judicial intelligence,its limitations are mainly reflected in the following aspects:the disagreement between the use of judicial intelligence big data and the causal relationship in the trial of cases,the weakening of judicial intelligence on judicial discretion,the dilemma of applying judicial policies in the use of judicial intelligence and the obstacle of political and ethical factors in the use of judicial intelligence.

关 键 词：司法智能化 自由裁量 司法大数据 司法政策 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学] TP399[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]