检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄晓春[1] 嵇欣[2] HUANG Xiaochun;JI Xin
机构地区:[1]上海大学社会学院,上海200444 [2]上海社会科学院生态与可持续发展研究所,上海200020
出 处:《学术月刊》2024年第8期79-91,共13页Academic Monthly
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“服务型政府改革的支持机制研究”(19BSH139)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:我国超大城市社会治理现代化改革进程中存在着一些深层张力,突出表现为制度创新与机制配套间的不衔接、政策网络中的协同困境以及数字化转型中的控制权配置难题。这三重张力相互缠绕、互为强化,对超大城市治理创新产生了复杂影响。基于此,有必要对多重张力的组织机理进行深入剖析,并以此为基础拓展和丰富系统改革观的内涵与政策着力点,指出未来改革需以连续的历史主义视角来看待治理创新,推动制度与机制间的协同变革;以激励兼容和流程再造为切入点,打造更具整合力的社会政策网络;以更为精细的上下分工为原则,推动整体布局下的多方共治格局。There are some deep tensions in the reform process of modernizing social governance in China's megacities,which are highlighted by the lack of convergence between institutional innovation and mechanism support,the dilemma of synergy in the policy network,and the difficulty of control allocation in the digital transformation.These triple tensions are intertwined and mutually reinforcing,which have a complex impact on the governance innovation of megacities.This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the organizational mechanism of the multiple tensions,on the basis of which it expands and enriches the connotation and policy focus of the systemic reform view.Finally,this paper points out that future reforms need to view governance innovation from a continuous historicist perspective,and promote synergistic changes between institutions and mechanisms;take incentive compatibility and process reengineering as the breakthrough point,and build a more integrative social policy network;and take a more fine-grained upper and lower division of government as the principle to promote a multi-party governance pattern under the overall layout.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.190.254