检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Nalin Kumar Sekar Vinayak Malaghan Digvijay S.Pawar
机构地区:[1]School of Mechanical Engineering,Vellore Institute of Technology,Vellore 632014,India [2]Department of Civil,Structural,and Environmental Engineering,Trinity College Dublin,The University of Dublin,Dublin 2,Ireland [3]Department of Civil Engineering,Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad,Kandi 502285,India
出 处:《Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles》2023年第4期202-210,共9页智能网联汽车(英文)
基 金:supported by the DST National Mission Interdisciplinary Cyber-Physical Systems(NM-ICPS);Technology Innovation Hub on Autonomous Navigation and Data Acquisition Systems:TiHAN Foundations at Indian Institute of Technology(IIT)Hyderabad.
摘 要:Several past studies showed that Autonomous Vehicles(AVs)can reduce crash risk,stop-and-go traffic,and travel time.To analyze the safety benefits of AVs,most of the researchers proposed algorithms and simulation-based techniques.However,these studies have not assessed the safety benefits of AVs for different vehicle types under heterogeneous conditions.With this opportunity,this study focuses on the benefits of AVs in terms of safety for different penetration rates under heterogeneous conditions.This study considered three driving logics during peak hour conditions to assess the performance of AVs in terms of safety.In VISSIM,default driving behavior models for AVs were adopted to consider cautious and all-knowing driving logic and the third driving logic(Atkins)was modeled in VISSIM using parameters adopted from the previous studies.To this end,using VISSIM,the travel time output results were obtained.Also,using Surrogate Safety Assessment Model(SSAM),conflicts were extracted from output trajectory files(VISSIM).The results suggest that“cautious driving logic”reduced travel time and crash risk significantly when compared to the other two driving logics during peak hour conditions.Furthermore,the statistical analysis clearly demonstrated that“cautious driving logic”differs significantly from the other two driving logics.When Market Penetration Rates(MPR)were 50%or greater,the“cautious driving logic”significantly outperforms the other two driving logics.The results highlight that adopting“cautious driving logic”at an expressway may significantly increase safety at higher AV penetration rates(above 50%).
关 键 词:automated vehicles driving behavior penetration rates driving logics and safety impacts
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.162.216