人际语用学视域下基于人情调控的情面共建研究  

Co-Constituting Qingmian Based on Renqing Regulation from the Perspective of Interpersonal Pragmatics

作　　者：赵林森 冉永平[1] ZHAO Linsen;RAN Yongping

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学

出　　处：《中国外语》2024年第4期28-37,共10页Foreign Languages in China

基　　金：国家哲学社科基金重点项目“社会-语用共同体视域下网络和谐话语体系建构及引导机制研究”(编号:21AYY011)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：汉语文化语境下的人际情感研究涉及人情、情面、感情等本土“情”概念的介入与阐释。本文基于面子共建理论(Arundale,2006,2010,2020)和情面威胁调节模式(Ran&Zhao,2018),探讨熟人利益冲突调解中第三方调解员如何利用人情调控实践联合共建双方当事人之间的情面。研究发现:(1)重利轻情往往引发关系疏离和情面威胁评价,导致人际冲突与关系紧张;(2)调解员实施了重情轻利、人情互惠和利益折中三种人情调控实践,协同共建双方当事人之间的情面,进而促成利益冲突化解与人际和谐。本文在此基础上提出基于人情调控的情面共建模式,以期为本土人际语用学研究提供新的视角。Indigenous"qing"concepts such as renqing(human emotion),qingmian(affection-based face)and ganqing(affection)are very important in investigating interpersonal emotions in Chinese culture.Based on Face Constituting Theory and Qingmian-Threat Regulation Model,this study investigates how mediators help the two parties conjointly co-constitute qingmian during mediation of interest disputes between acquaintances in China.It is found that:(1)"Valuing li(interest)above qing(affection)"often violates the renqing principle,triggering interpretations of qingmian-threat/relational separation and leading to interpersonal conflicts or relational tensions;(2)The mediators employ three types of renqing regulation practices,namely,"valuing qing above li","reciprocal renqing"and"splitting the difference"in order to help the disputants coconstitute qingmian,and finally resolve the conflicts and achieve interpersonal harmony.Consequently,a model of co-constituting qingmian based on renqing regulation is proposed,with the aim of shedding new insights into the indigenous study of interpersonal pragmatics.

关 键 词：利益冲突调解 情面共建 人情调控 本土人际语用学研究 

分 类 号：H0-06[语言文字—语言学]