检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈学颖 金沁纯 金亚伟 邱楠 王蔚 秦胜梅 柏瑾 梁义秀 汪菁峰 宿燕岗 Chen Xueying;Jin Qinchun;Jin Yawei;Qiu Nan;Wang Wei;Qin Shengmei;Bai Jin;Liang Yixiu;Wang Jingfeng;Su Yangang(Department of Cardiology,Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases,National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine,Shanghai 200032,China)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属中山医院心内科、上海市心血管病研究所、国家放射与治疗临床医学研究中心,上海200032
出 处:《中华心律失常学杂志》2024年第4期285-290,共6页Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
基 金:国家自然科学基金(82170387);上海申康中心临床研究项目(SHDC2020CR4003);复旦大学附属中山医院临床研究专项基金(2020ZSLC08)。
摘 要:目的探讨在心室起搏依赖伴射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中行左束支起搏的可行性和长期疗效。方法本研究为前瞻性观察性研究,连续入选2019年1月至2021年12月在复旦大学附属中山医院心内科因心动过缓、预计心室起搏比例>40%且左心室射血分数<40%,行左束支起搏的患者。比较术前与术后QRS时限、起搏参数(阈值、感知和阻抗)、超声心动图参数的变化。结果共入选35例HFrEF患者,年龄(69.0±13.1)岁,其中男26例。左束支起搏成功率为100%。随访(2.6±0.7)年,患者术后QRS时限较术前趋于改善[(142.9±46.4)ms对(133.0±16.8)ms,P=0.088]。术中和术后随访相比,患者起搏阈值、感知和阻抗均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前和术后随访相比,患者左心室射血分数(34.2%±5.1%对44.7%±12.6%,P<0.0001)、左心室舒张末期内径[(62.7±12.2)mm对(58.3±11.9)mm,P=0.002]、左心室收缩末期内径[(52.5±11.7)mm对(47.5±13.4)mm,P=0.004]均显著改善,差异有统计学意义。结论左束支起搏在心室起搏依赖伴HFrEF患者中成功率高,术后长期随访起搏参数稳定,心功能显著改善。Objective To explore the feasibility and long-term outcomes of left bundle branch pacing(LBBP)in patients with ventricular pacing dependence and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF).Methods This study was a prospective observational study.Patients indicated for LBBP due to bradycardia and an expected ventricular pacing ratio of>40%with a left ventricular ejection fraction of<40%in Department of Cardiology,Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University between January 2019 and December 2021 were consecutively enrolled.The QRS duration,pacing parameters(thresholds,perception and impedance),and echocardiographic parameters were compared between baseline and during follow-up.Results A total of 35 HFrEF patients mean age(69.0±13.1)years,26 males,were enrolled,and all patients successfully underwent LBBP.The follow-up time was(2.6±0.7)years.The QRS duration trended towards improvement[(142.9±46.4)ms vs.(133.0±16.8)ms,P=0.088].Pacing parameters including thresholds,perception,and impedance all remained stable during follow-ups(P>0.05).Significant difference was observed in left ventricular ejection fraction(34.2%±5.1%vs.44.7%±12.6%,P<0.0001),left ventricular end-diastolic internal diameter[(62.7±12.2)mm vs.(58.3±11.9)mm,P=0.002],and left ventricular end-systolic internal diameter[(52.5±11.7)mm vs.(47.5±13.4)mm,P=0.004]between baseline and during follow-up.Conclusion LBBP has a high success rate in patients with ventricular pacing dependence and HErEF,with stable pacing parameters and significant improvement in cardiac function at long-term follow-up.
关 键 词:心脏起搏器 人工 心力衰竭 左心室射血分数 心室起搏依赖 左束支起搏
分 类 号:R541.6[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.149