检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严驰 YAN Chi(School of Law,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)
机构地区:[1]同济大学法学院,上海200092
出 处:《南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期30-42,共13页Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“知识产权跨国平行争议的程序应对与反制对策研究”(22YJA820030);湖北省知识产权局软科学项目“湖北重大产业知识产权安全风险预警以及防控机制研究”(20232S0064)。
摘 要:生成式人工智能的发展对现有著作权法律制度提出了新挑战,亟须从人文视角重新审视生成式人工智能的“作者”问题。罗兰·巴特是现代作者理论的代表人物,他在不同时期出版的论著中,阐释了从“作者‘不在’”到“作者已死”,再到“作者‘回归’”的理论。罗兰·巴特的作者观对生成式人工智能“作者”问题的思考颇具启发意义。生成式人工智能虽然已具备作者外观,仍不宜被认定为主体层面的“作者”。今后生成式人工智能发展应以人为本,融合多学科视角,推进类脑人工智能研究,考虑将人工智能生成内容纳入公共领域,积极探索构建人机和谐共生之道,引导科技向善而行。The development of generative artificial intelligence poses new challenges to the existing copyright legal system,and there is an urgent need to re-examine the“author”problem of generative artificial intelligence from the perspective of humanity.Roland Barthes is a representative figure of modern author theory.In his works published in different periods,he realized the theoretical changes from“The Author's‘Absence’”to“The Author is Dead”,and then“The Author's‘Return’”.Roland Barthes'author view is of great enlightening significance for thinking on the“Author”problem of generative artificial intelligence.Although generative artificial intelligence has the appearance of author,it should not be recognized as“Author”at the subject level.In the future,the development of generative artificial intelligence should be people-oriented,integrate multi-disciplinary perspectives,promote brain-like artificial intelligence research,consider including the generated content of artificial intelligence into the public domain,actively explore the way to build a harmonious coexistence of human-machine,and guide science and technology towards goodness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.9.170