历史是一条奔流不息的河——再评戴史翠《常规帝国的不确定性》引发的学术论争  

History is a River that Never Stops Flowing--Re-Evaluating the Professional Debate Sparked by Maura Dykstra's Book Uncertainty in the Empire of Routine:The Administrative Revolution of the Eighteenth-Century Qing State

作　　者：孙家红[1] Sun Jiahong(Law Institute of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所,北京100720

出　　处：《社会科学论坛》2024年第5期196-224,共29页Tribune of Social Sciences

摘　　要：戴史翠的个人专著《常规帝国的不确定性》出版后,在海内外学界引起广泛争议。2023年9月乔志健发表长篇书评,之后相继有几位学者对之表达批评意见,并引起作者撰文回应,提出反批评。对于这场学术论争进行重新审视,针对彼此在专业知识、方法论等方面的巨大分歧,提出系统批评,并对戴书核心论证的“18世纪清朝的行政革命”,结合相关史料尝试提出不同的思考维度,冀收抛砖引玉之效。After the publication of Maura Dykstra's monograph Uncertainty in the Empire of Routine:The Administrative Revolution of the Eighteenth-Century Qing State,it caused widespread controversy in international sinology circles.Since George Zhijian Qiao published a long book review in September 2023,several scholars have expressed critical opinions on it,which has prompted the author to write a response and put forward counter-criticism.This article re-examines the views of all parties in this professional debate based on a comprehensive reading of Dykstra's English work,relevant book reviews,and multiple checks of the original materials.The author makes a systematic criticism of the huge differences between the two parties in terms of professional knowledge,methodology,etc.,and attempts to propose different dimensions of thinking on Dykstra's core argument,the administrative revolution of the eighteenth-century,based on relevant historical materials,hoping to stimulate further discussion.

关 键 词：常规帝国 不确定性 戴史翠 乔志健 书评 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]