程序衔接角度下试论我国体育仲裁制度的完善——兼议体育仲裁独立性  

Ways to Understand and Strengthen the Independence of China’s Sports Arbitration System from the Perspective of Procedure Coordination with Sports Litigation

作　　者：戴璐嵘 DAI Lu-rong(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430000,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430000

出　　处：《福建体育科技》2024年第4期38-43,共6页Fujian Sports Science and Technology

摘　　要：体育仲裁是专门以体育纠纷为对象的争端解决方式,具有普通仲裁的费用低、操作灵活和高效性的特质。中国建立的体育仲裁制度因为在设立及运行各环节中行政权力的分量过重,导致了其无自觉的政治倾向,当事人地位实质不平等以及立法技术有待提高也是现有体育仲裁制度的缺陷,改革成为应要之举。本文以体育仲裁机制为研究对象,深入分析现存的中国体育仲裁所存在的几种明显弊端,辅以对仲裁独立性的证明,尝试从诉讼和仲裁的程序衔接角度入手,选择受理案件、司法审查和涉外适用三个角度来研究体育仲裁的发展进路,最后提出具体而全面的完善方案。Sports arbitration is a special dispute settlement method for sports disputes,which has the characteristics of low cost,flexible operation and high efficiency.Due to the excessive emphasis on administrative power in the establishment and operation of the sports arbitration system recently established in 2023 in China,it has no-conscious political tendency.The substantial inequality of the status of the dispute-involved parties and the need to improve the legislative technology are also regarded as the defects of the existing sports arbitration system.Choosing the mechanism of sports arbitration in China as the research object,this paper makes an in-depth analysis of several obvious drawbacks existing in the newly established China’s sports arbitration system,tries to demonstrate the independence of arbitration,attempts to curve out the creative development path of sports arbitration from the perspective of procedural coordination between litigation and arbitration.It concentrates on three aspects,case acceptance,judicial review and application of foreign-related law,to do the analysis,in order to finally put forward the adoptable,specific and comprehensive developing plans for the China’s sports arbitration system improvement.

关 键 词：体育仲裁 现有缺陷 独立性 程序衔接 涉外适用 

分 类 号：G812.3[文化科学—体育学]