伊布利特与电复律用于心房颤动射频消融术中复律的临床效果对比  

Comparison of Clinical Effects of Ibrahimovic Park Jung Su and Electric Cardioversion in Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

作　　者：沈斌 潘程婕 Shen Bin;Pan Chengjie(Liuzhou workers hospital,Liuchou Guangri 545000,China)

机构地区：[1]柳州市工人医院,广西柳州545000

出　　处：《生命科学仪器》2024年第3期121-124,共4页Life Science Instruments

摘　　要：目的对比伊布利特与传统电复律用于持续性心房颤动射频消融术中的临床效果。方法按照纳入与排除标准选择柳州市工人医院心内科2022年1月至2024年3月行射频消融术的持续性房颤患者80例,将患者分为使用伊布利特复律的药物复律组、使用150-200J双向电复律的电复律组,每组40例。对比两组复律成功率与不良反应情况。结果两组复律成功率对比,电复律组高于药物复律组,P<0.05。两组复律期间不良反应发生率对比,P>0.05。结论针对行射频消融术的持续性房颤患者,相比使用伊布利特复律,采用传统电复律的成功率更高,但两者在引发不良反应方面无明显差异。Objective:To compare the clinical effects of Ibrahimovic Park Jung Su and traditional cardioversion in radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation.Methods:According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,80 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent radiofrequency ablation from January 2022 to March 2024 in the Department of Cardiology,Liuzhou Workers'Hospital were selected,and they were divided into drug cardioversion group using Ibuprofen and electric cardioversion group using 150-200J bidirectional cardioversion,with 40 patients in each group.The success rate and adverse reactions of cardioversion were compared between the two groups.Results:The success rate of cardioversion between the two groups was higher in electric cardioversion group than in drug cardioversion group,P<0.05.The incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups during cardioversion was compared,P>0.05.Conclusion:Compared with Ibrahimovic-Park Jung Su cardioversion,the traditional cardioversion has a higher success rate for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency ablation,but there is no significant difference between them in causing adverse reactions.

关 键 词：伊布利特 心房颤动 电复律 射频消融术 

分 类 号：R547.7[医药卫生—心血管疾病]