阶层犯罪论本土化改造的缺憾与要阶论的提倡  

The Shortcomings of Localization Reform of Hierarchy Theory of Crime and the Promotion of the Theory of Order

作　　者：雍自元[1] YONG Ziyuan(School of Law,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui 241000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学法学院,安徽芜湖241000

出　　处：《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第5期107-115,共9页Journal of Anhui Normal University(Soc.Sci.)

基　　金：安徽省高等学校人文社会科学研究重大项目“论习近平对司法公正理论的创新与发展”(SK2021ZD0018)。

摘　　要：阶层犯罪论中要件功能失衡、逻辑关系错乱、故意和过失的体系定位不明、出罪链条长、核心概念内涵艰涩。虽然国内阶层论者对该理论进行了改造,但都是在阶层论体系之内进行的修补与调整,无法解决阶层论固有的问题。吸收阶层论和要件论优长并克服二者缺陷的要阶论将违法、主体与责任作为犯罪构成的要件,各要件入罪联合,出罪独立,要件内部成罪要素和出罪要素两两观照。要阶论契合先客观后主观的认识规律,符合本国话语体系与思维习惯。In hierarchy theory,there are issues such as the imbalance of element functions,disordered logical relationships,unclear systematic positioning of intent and negligence,lengthy exoneration processes,and obscure core concept definitions.Although the domestic scholars of hierarchy have reformed the theory,they have repaired and adjusted it within the system of hierarchy theory,which cannot solve the inherent problems.Absorbing advantage of hierarchy theory and elements theory,overcoming the defects of both,the theory of order takes lawbreaking,subject and responsibility as the elements of crime.Each element jointly exerts the function of identifying crime and independently plays the function of excluding crime,and elements of establishment and exclusion of crime are viewed in pairs.The theory of order conforms to the cognitive law of first objective and then subjective,and conforms to the national discourse system and thinking habits.

关 键 词：犯罪构成 阶层论 要阶论 本土化 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]