社区治理数字化转型结果因何不同?——一个整合性分析框架  

Why Are the Results of Community Governance Digital Transformation Different?An Integrated Analytical Framework

作　　者：李哲 权一章 吴建南[2,3] LI Zhe;QUAN Yizhang;WU Jiannan

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校(国家行政学院)国家治理教研部(电子政务研究中心),北京100091 [2]上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院,上海200030 [3]上海交通大学中国城市治理研究院,上海200030

出　　处：《城市发展研究》2024年第8期121-127,共7页Urban Development Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“特大城市社会治理数字化转型的机制与优化路径研究”(21&ZD162)。

摘　　要：社区治理数字化转型是推进基层治理现代化的路径,但数字化转型的结果却不尽相同。基于技术执行框架和合供理论,构建社区治理数字化转型的整合性分析框架,包括客观技术、制度安排、利益相关者、合供和结果。将整合性分析框架应用于上海市S社区治理的双案例分析,解释数字化转型结果差异的原因,并进一步对框架的适用性进行讨论。该整合性框架对社区治理数字化转型具有理论和实践启示。The digital transformation of community governance is the path to the modernization of grassroots governance,but the results of digital transformation are not the same.This paper integrates the technology enactment framework and coproduction theory to construct an integrated analysis framework for the digital transformation of community governance,which includes objective technology,institutional arrangements,stakeholders,coproduction and results.This paper applies the integrated analysis framework to a two-case study of S community governance in Shanghai,explains the reasons for the difference in the digital transformation results,and further discusses the framework.The integration framework proposed in this paper has theoretical and practical implications for the digital transformation of community governance.

关 键 词：社区治理 城市治理 数字化转型 合供 整合性框架 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]