ZSnSb11-6巴氏合金与ZQSn10-1锡青铜耐磨性对比研究  

Comparative Study on Wear Resistance of ZSnSb11-6 Babbitt Alloy and ZQSn10-1 Tin Bronze

作　　者：张玮炜 齐瑾 黄国兵 朱丽慧[2] 张金鹏 王小静[3] ZHANG Weiwei;QI Jin;HUANG Guobing;ZHU Lihui;ZHANG Jinpeng;WANG Xiaojing(Shanghai Marine Equipment Research Institute,Shanghai 200031,China;School of Materials Science and Engineering,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China;School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)

机构地区：[1]上海船舶设备研究所,上海200031 [2]上海大学材料科学与工程学院,上海200444 [3]上海大学机电工程与自动化学院,上海200444

出　　处：《上海金属》2024年第5期22-26,共5页Shanghai Metals

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(52075311)。

摘　　要：采用MFT-5000型摩擦磨损试验机,对比研究了ZSnSb11-6巴氏合金和ZQSn10-1锡青铜在不同载荷下的耐磨性。结果表明:当载荷为20 N时,锡青铜的磨损率较巴氏合金低78.3%,当载荷为140 N时,锡青铜的磨损率较巴氏合金仍低36.3%;ZSnSb11-6巴氏合金由于硬度较低,磨痕和犁沟较深,同时随着载荷的增加,易在硬质相β相(SnSb)处发生剥落;ZQSn10-1锡青铜由于硬度较高,磨痕和犁沟较浅,同时由于(α+δ)硬质相的尺寸较小,无尖锐的棱角,剥落程度轻。因此,在20~140 N载荷下ZQSn10-1锡青铜的耐磨性优于ZSnSb11-6巴氏合金。Wear resistance of ZSnSb11-6 Babbitt alloy and ZQSn10-1 tin bronze under different loads was compared and studied by using MFT-5000 friction-wear testing machine.The results showed that(a)when the load was 20 N,the wear rate of tin bronze was 78.3%lower than that of Babbitt alloy,and when the load was 140 N,the wear rate of tin bronze was 36.3%lower than that of Babbitt alloy;(b)ZSnSb11-6 Babbitt alloy exhibited deeper wear scars and furrows due to its lower hardness,and was prone to spalling at hardβphase(SnSb)with increase in load;and(c)ZQSn10-1 tin bronze exhibited shallow wear scars and furrow due to its higher hardness,meanwhile,because the hard phase(α+δ)had relatively small size and no sharp edges,the degree of its spalling was slightly;(d)therefore,the wear resistance of ZQSn10-1 tin bronze was better than that of ZSnSb11-6 Babbitt alloy under a load of 20 to 140 N.

关 键 词：ZSnSb11-6巴氏合金 ZQSn10-1锡青铜 磨损机制 硬度 

分 类 号：TG115.58[金属学及工艺—物理冶金]