检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李至钰 Zhiyu Li(School of Law,Tiangong University,Tianjin)
机构地区:[1]天津工业大学法学院,天津
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第8期4864-4870,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:优化法官责任制度是有关司法改革的重要一环,公正的法官责任制度有助于司法实践。清代在前朝基础上建立了完善的司法官责任制度,从案件审理程序开始到审判工作结尾,规定了刑事、民事、行政的追责方式,具有责任制度类型丰富、追责方式多样、附带措施齐全的特点。清代司法官责任制度的系统性与可操作性可为当下法官责任制的革新提供启迪。Optimizing the system of judges’responsibility is an important part of judicial reform,and a fair system of judges’responsibility is conducive to judicial practice.On the basis of the previous dyn-asty,the Qing Dynasty established a perfect system of judicial officer responsibility system,from the beginning of the trial procedure to the end of the trial work,stipulating criminal,civil and ad-ministrative accountability methods,which has the characteristics of rich types of responsibility system,diverse methods of accountability,and complete incidental measures.The systematiza-tion and operability of the judicial responsibility system in the Qing Dynasty can provide inspira-tion for the innovation of the current judicial responsibility system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.136.20.207