检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:凌雪 Xue Ling(College of Humanities and Law,North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan Hebei)
机构地区:[1]华北理工大学人文法律学院,河北唐山
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第8期5072-5077,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:自我国规定了认罪认罚从宽制度以来,明确了检察院的量刑建议权,实践证明,认罪认罚制度不仅能够提高司法效率,节约成本,减少诉累,通过给与犯罪嫌疑人和被告人更为宽宥的处理,强化对人权的保障。然而,在实践中检察院的量刑建议权却存在一些问题亟待解决。文章旨在通过探寻在量刑建议程序中检察院、法院、被追诉人之间的关系,针对所存在的问题,提出具体完善的路径。量刑建议的制度还有待在具体的司法实践中进行进一步的发展和完善。Since our country has stipulated the system of leniency of guilty plea,the Procuratorate has made clear the right of sentencing suggestion.Practice has proved that the system of guilty plea can not only improve judicial efficiency,save costs and reduce the burden of prosecution,the protection of human rights will be strengthened through more lenient treatment of criminal suspects and defendants.However,in practice,there are some problems in the in the Procuratorate’s sentencing suggestion right that need to be solved.This paper aims to explore the relationship between the procuratorate,the court and the accused in the procedure of sentencing suggestion,and propose specific ways to improve the existing problems.The system of sentencing suggestion still needs to be further developed and perfected in the concrete judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49