重新仲裁制度探究  

Exploration of the Re-Arbitration System

作　　者：孟宪浩 Xianhao Meng(School of Humanities and Law,North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan Hebei)

机构地区：[1]华北理工大学人文法律学院,河北唐山

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2024年第8期5229-5234,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：在当前司法实践中,重新仲裁制度可以有效减轻当事人的诉讼负担,缓解司法压力,但是我国的重新仲裁制度还有很大不足,重新仲裁制度主要适用于实体问题,对于程序性问题关注较少,并且重新仲裁与仲裁裁决的终局性和既判力相矛盾,重新仲裁的启动主体与审理主体过于单一。重新仲裁制度应当适用于程序瑕疵,而非实体争议,要发挥撤销仲裁的积极作用,化解重新仲裁与仲裁裁决的终局性和既判力的矛盾,通过规范重新仲裁的启动主体和审理主体,明确重新仲裁的主体,来完善重新仲裁程序,为法院提供合理、具体、可操作的适用思路。In the current judicial practice,the re-arbitration system can effectively reduce the litigation bur-den of the parties and alleviate the judicial pressure,but there are still great deficiencies in China’s re-arbitration system,which is mainly applicable to substantive issues,and pays less attention to procedural issues,and the re-arbitration contradicts the finality and res judicata of the arbitral award,and the initiation of re-arbitration and the subject of the trial are too single.The re-arbitra-tion system should be applied to procedural defects rather than substantive disputes,and should play a positive role in revoking arbitration,resolve the contradiction between the finality and res judicata between re-arbitration and arbitral awards,and improve the re-arbitration procedure by standardizing the initiation and hearing subjects of re-arbitration,and clarifying the subject of rearbitration,so as to provide the courts with reasonable,specific and actionable application ideas.

关 键 词：重新仲裁 终局性 既判力 撤销仲裁裁决 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]