生成式人工智能生成内容的权益归属研究  

Research on the Ownership of Rights of Generative AI-Generated Content

作　　者：张文睿 唐逸凡 ZHANG Wenrui;TANG Yifan(College of Law,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China;Institute of political and history Cangzhou Normal University,Cangzhou 061000,China)

机构地区：[1]河北大学法学院,河北保定071002 [2]沧州师范学院政史学院,河北沧州061000

出　　处：《河南科技》2024年第15期115-120,共6页Henan Science and Technology

基　　金：河北省创新能力提升计划项目(软科学研究专项)“河北省后冬奥时代冰雪产业高质量发展法治保障研究”(23555701D)。

摘　　要：【目的】明晰生成式人工智能生成内容的权益归属,缓和生成式人工智能与著作权法之间的矛盾,为生成式人工智能著作权法保障提供建议。【方法】通过分析生成式人工智能的运行逻辑,结合著作权权属认定的基本理论与司法实践,探寻生成式人工智能生成内容权益归属的基本原则。【结果】生成式人工智能本身不可作为著作权主体,而在用户与服务提供者之间,当以约定为先,没有约定时则顺位适用法定权属配置规则。【结论】生成式人工智能生成内容权益归属的厘定,有助于纾解生成式人工智能所面临的法律风险,实现著作权法鼓励文化创新的立法目的。[Purposes]This paper aims to clarify the ownership of rights and interests in generative AI-generated content aims to alleviate the sharp contradiction between generative AI and copyright law,and provide copyright law protection for the development of generative AI.[Methods]By analyzing the opera⁃tion logic of generative AI,and combining with the basic theory and judicial practice of copyright owner⁃ship determination,this paper explores the basic principles of ownership of content generated by genera⁃tive AI.[Findings]After clarifying the basic principles,it can be seen that generative AI itself cannot be used as a copyright subject,and between users and service providers,when the agreement takes prece⁃dence,and if there is no agreement,the legal ownership allocation rules will be applied in order.[Conclu⁃sions]The determination of the ownership of the rights and interests of generative AI-generated content will help alleviate the legal risks faced by generative AI and achieve the legislative purpose of the Copy⁃right Law to encourage cultural innovation.

关 键 词：生成式人工智能 服务提供者 用户 作者中心主义 投资保护主义 权益归属 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]