检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周虹 Zhou Hong
机构地区:[1]广东省中山市人民检察院 [2]西南政法大学
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2024年第3期14-19,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:《民事诉讼法》及其《民诉法解释》尚未对诉讼代理权出现瑕疵时人民法院的处理机制做出制度安排,对此,可以在有效借鉴域外的暂时许可进行诉讼、指定期间补正制度基础上对我国诉讼代理权瑕疵的补正问题进行制度化构建。因此,按照问题导向的研究要求,应当以辩论原则、比例原则、诚实信用原则为指导,从建立以职权查明代理权是否存在为基础的司法秩序维护机制、设定相对灵活的瑕疵补正机制以保障当事人辩论权和防范通过代理权瑕疵补正机制滥用诉讼权利等不同维度,推动构建诉讼代理权瑕疵的补正机制,从而促进诉讼程序的有序有效运行。A review of the institutional texts reveals that the Civil Procedure Law of China and its Interpretations have yet to establish institutional arrangements for the handling mechanism by the people's courts when defects arise in litigation representation rights.In response,we can draw upon the systems of temporary permission to litigate and designated period for correction practiced in foreign jurisdictions to institutionalize the correction of defects in litigation representation rights in China.Consequently,adhering to the research requirements guided by problem orientation,we should be guided by the principles of adversarialism,proportionality,and good faith.From various dimensions,including establishing a judicial order maintenance mechanism based on the court's duty to ascertain the existence of representation rights,setting up a relatively flexible mechanism for correcting defects to safeguard the parties'right to debate,and preventing the abuse of litigation rights through the correction mechanism for defects in representation rights,we should strive to promote the construction of a correction mechanism for defects in litigation representation rights.This will facilitate the orderly and effective operation of litigation procedures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15