检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈琦[1] Chen Qi
机构地区:[1]吉林大学法学院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2024年第3期82-87,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:在迈向大数据时代的过程中,我国面临着网络数据刑法保护机制的现代化挑战。传统刑法在保护网络数据方面显得力不从心,特别是在应对非法获取普通网络数据的行为上,其规制作用明显滞后。鉴于此,大数据背景下,需要依据数据权益的逻辑重新审视非法获取普通网络数据行为的刑事法律规制,确保刑法的立法稳定性与司法解释的适用性,超越以系统安全为中心的单一思维模式,深入挖掘现有罪名的适用潜力。In the process of advancing towards the era of big data,China faces the modernization challenge of the criminal law protection mechanism for network data.Traditional criminal law appears to be inadequate in protecting network data,especially in addressing the illegal acquisition of ordinary network data,where its regulatory role is significantly lagging behind.In view of this,under the background of big data,it is necessary to re-examine the criminal legal regulation of the illegal acquisition of ordinary network data based on the logic of data rights and interests,ensuring the legislative stability of criminal law and the applicability of judicial interpretations.This requires transcending the single-minded mode of thinking centered on system security and deeply exploring the application potential of existing charges.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195