雇主间“禁止偷猎”协议的法律规制  

The Regulation of"No Poaching"Agreements between Employers

作　　者：葛家欣 Ge Jiaxin

机构地区：[1]西南财经大学法学院

出　　处：《竞争政策研究》2024年第4期78-94,共17页Competition Policy Research

基　　金：“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”引进人才科研启动资助项目(项目编号:JBK23YJ49)的研究成果。

摘　　要：为限制劳动力要素流动,雇主之间通过达成的互不招揽、互不雇佣彼此员工的协议来进行“不偷猎”或“不挖角”。该行为既具有合理性,同时又具有危害性。从规制现状来看,无论是契约自由的认定原则还是劳动法的规制模式均存在不足,难以实现对劳动力市场竞争秩序的维护。反垄断法虽具有维护公平竞争、规范竞争秩序的功能,但在实践中却对其关注不足。反垄断法规制雇主间“禁止偷猎”协议行为具备正当性。在反垄断法视野下,需要基于不同行为类型,考量行为的反竞争效果。为解决制度供给不足的现实困境,需要明确雇主和劳动者在反垄断法中的主体资格,将行为纳入垄断协议规制框架中,并实现与劳动法规制的协调配合。In order to restrict the flow of labor factors,employers engage in"no poaching"agreements that do not recruit or hire each other's employees.This behavior is both reasonable and harmful.From the perspective of regulatory status,both the principle of recognizing contractual freedom and the regulatory model of labor law have shortcomings:it is difficult to maintain the order of competition in the labor market.Although the Anti-monopoly Law has the function of maintaining fair competition and regulating competition order,it pays little attention to it in practice.The anti-monopoly regulations make it legitimate for employers to engage in agreements prohibiting poaching.In the perspective of antitrust law,it is necessary to consider the anti-competitive effects of different types of behavior.To solve the practical dilemma of insufficient institutional supply,it is necessary to clarify the subject qualifications of employers and workers in the anti-monopoly law,incorporate behavior into the framework of monopoly agreement regulation,and achieve coordination and cooperation with labor law regulations.

关 键 词：反垄断法 雇主 禁止偷猎 劳动力市场 劳动法 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]