检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季雯婷 田明舸 Ji Wenting;Tian Mingge
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学旅游学院 [2]上海旅游高等专科学校会展与经济管理学院
出 处:《文化产业研究》2024年第1期129-144,共16页Cultural Industry Research
基 金:教育部人文社科青年基金项目(23YJC890019)。
摘 要:本文基于贸易结构视角,构建了中国与RCEP成员国之间的文化产品贸易的专业化系数和一致性系数,并测度了中国与RCEP成员国之间的贸易竞争性指数、贸易竞争优势以及贸易互补性指数,并以此分析中国与RCEP成员国之间的文化产品竞合关系。研究表明:中国是RCEP成员国主要的文化产品出口市场之一。与此同时,中国与大多数RCEP成员国之间的文化产品贸易结构较为相似,存在激烈竞争。在贸易竞争优势方面,中国保持了较高的文化产品贸易竞争优势,但在近年来呈现一定程度的下滑趋势。而在贸易结构的契合度方面,中国文化贸易出口与大多数RCEP成员国的进口之间高度契合,文化产品贸易互补空间较大。在RCEP的背景下,中国需要施行更加精准的文化贸易进出口措施,最大限度地减少文化贸易资源错配。Based on the perspective of trade structure,this paper constructs the coefficient of specialization and coefficient of conformity of cultural product trade between China and RCEP members,and measures the trade competitiveness index,trade competitive advantage,and trade complementarity index between China and RCEP members.Based on this,this paper analyzes the competition and cooperation relationship of cultural products between China and RCEP members.The result shows that China is one of the main export markets for cultural products in RCEP members.At the same time,the trade structure of cultural products between China and most RCEP members is relatively similar,and there is fierce competition.In terms of trade competitive advantage,China has maintained a relatively high competitive advantage in cultural product trade,but has shown a certain decline in recent years.In terms of the fit of trade structure,there is a high degree of fit between China's cultural trade exports and the imports of most RCEP member countries,and there is a large space for complementary trade in cultural products.In the context of RCEP,China needs to implement more precise cultural trade import and export measures to minimize the mismatch of cultural trade resources.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7