碳交易驱动下的创新组态——基于高碳企业的动态fsQCA分析  

Innovation Configurations Driven by Carbon Trading:A Dynamic fsQCA Analysis Based on High-carbon Enterprises

作　　者：陈艺心 张哲[1] CHEN Yixin;ZHANG Zhe(School of Logistics and Management Engineering,Yunnan University of Finance and Economics,Kunming 650221,China)

机构地区：[1]云南财经大学物流与管理工程学院,昆明650221

出　　处：《科技和产业》2024年第17期175-182,共8页Science Technology and Industry

基　　金：云南财经大学研究生创新基金(2024YUFEYC096)。

摘　　要：绿色技术是引领绿色发展的第一动力。选取2011—2020年试点省份的高碳排放企业为样本,基于技术-组织-环境(TOE)框架探究绿色技术创新路径。将时间跨度划为“十二五”与“十三五”规划期探讨政策变化是否影响创新策略。研究表明,两个时期共识别出7种组态路径,分为数字化驱动、资本灵活驱动及供应链配置驱动型。进一步研究表明,首席执行官(CEO)绿色经验贯彻始终,数字化对创新具有引领作用,尽管经历政策变化,两个规划期的路径相似,表明绿色创新需具备渐进性与一致性。Green technology is the primary driver of green development.Selecting high-carbon emission enterprises in pilot provinces between 2011 and 2020 as the research sample,the innovation pathways of green technology based on the technology-organization-environment(TOE)framework is explored,and the time span is divided into the 12th and 13th Five-Year Plan periods to discuss whether policy changes have influenced innovation strategies.The study identifies seven configurational pathways across both periods,categorized as digital-driven,capital flexibility-driven,and supply chain configuration-driven.Further research shows that the chief executive officer(CEO)’s commitment to green experience remains steadfast and that digitization plays a leading role in innovation;despite policy shifts,the innovation pathways during the two planning periods are similar,indicating that green innovation requires both incremental and consistent development.

关 键 词：绿色创新 技术-组织-环境(TOE)框架 供应链配置 数字化转型 动态模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA) 

分 类 号：C931[经济管理—管理学]