当代美国反智主义盛行的根源、影响及应对  

The Root,Influence and Response of the Prevailing Anti-Intellectualism in Contemporary America

作　　者：李怡桐 郭佳楠 Li Yitong;Guo Jianan(School of Marxism,Zhengzhou University of Business and Technology,Zhengzhou 450000,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州工商学院马克思主义学院,河南郑州450000

出　　处：《黑河学院学报》2024年第8期25-29,共5页Journal of Heihe University

基　　金：2021年度国家社科基金高校思政课研究专项“法治教育融入高校思政课流程优化研究”(21VSZ031);郑州工商学院科研创新项目“基于ChatGPT类生成式人工智能的红色文化传播现状与策略研究”(2023-KYZD-01)。

摘　　要：反智主义的形成在美国有着较为深厚的社会历史根基和特殊的政治基础。反智主义表面上是反知识、反精英、反理性,本质却是一种相关政治与权力策略的组合,并最终服务于政治掌权者所提出的决定或其所代表的政治体系。反智主义行为已经成为一种突出的话语体系,应在三方面进行有智追求,即建构实现知识自由的机制,重新认识专家与政治决策者之间的角色分化,加强公众对政府与专家知识的理解与信任,同时还应不断提高公民科学素养和文化教育水平,从而自我摒弃和挞伐反智主义追逐的不良风气,为进一步优化政策质量、解决社会问题提供理论参考。The formation of anti-intellectualism has a relatively deep social and historical foundation and a special political foundation in the United States.On the surface,anti-intellectualism is anti-knowledge,anti-elite and anti-rationality.In essence,it is a combination of relevant politics and power strategies that ultimately serve the decision put forward by the political power holder or the political system it represents.Anti-intellectualism has become a prominent discourse system,which should be pursued intelligently in three aspects,namely,constructing a mechanism to realize knowledge freedom,re-recognizing the role differentiation between experts and political decision-makers,strengthening the public’s understanding and trust in the knowledge of government and experts,and constantly improving citizens’scientifi c literacy and cultural education level.All this can provide theoretical reference for further optimizing policy quality and solving social problems by abandoning and denouncing the bad atmosphere of anti-intellectualism.

关 键 词：新冠肺炎疫情 美国 反智主义 专家 知识自由 角色分化 公民素养 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]