政府竞争模式、策略组合与地区发展质量  

Government Competitive Modes,Strategy Combination ang Regional Development Quality

作　　者：杨青 苑春荟 YANG Qing;YUAN Chunhui(School of Business,Shanxi Datong University,Datong,Shanxi 037008,China;School of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Beijing 100089,China)

机构地区：[1]山西大同大学商学院,山西大同037008 [2]北京邮电大学经济管理学院,北京100089

出　　处：《贵州财经大学学报》2024年第5期100-110,共11页Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：国家自然科学基金“企业技术创新效率视角下我国研发财税政策的激励作用、调节效应与政策优化研究(编号71804008)”、教育部哲学社会科学后期资助项目(18JHQ078)项目支持。

摘　　要：不同的政府竞争模式对地区发展质量存在差异化影响,剖析该差异化影响、建立利于高质量发展的竞争体制对当前推动经济转型至关重要。现有研究仅关注特定政府竞争模式对经济增长的直接影响,缺乏对不同竞争模式及各类具体竞争策略的作用机理和质量效应的比较研究,同时假定政府仅采用单一竞争模式,忽视了多种竞争策略的组合效果。将政府竞争模式分为投入竞争、保护竞争和制度竞争三类,基于1997-2020年我国31个省级区域面板数据探讨不同政府竞争模式对发展质量的影响,结果表明:投入竞争对高质量发展存在双向影响,保护竞争以负面影响为主,制度竞争则显著促进了地区高质量发展。该结论在替换代理变量后依然稳健。通过交互效应模型和策略组合虚拟变量分析政府竞争策略组合效果,结果显示同模式的不同竞争策略间存在替代效应,不同竞争模式的竞争策略组合后其政策效果有所削弱,但公共服务与简政放权的组合却有助于高质量发展。Government competition modes could effect regional development quality in differentiated forms.It is crucial for current economic transformation to analyze that differentiated impact and establish a competition system conducive to high-quality development.Existing research only focuses on the direct impact of specific government competition models on economic growth,lacking comparative research on the mechanisms and quality effects of different competition models and various competition strategies.Also,it is assumed that governments only adopts one single competitive model,ignoring the combination effects of multiple competitive strategies.Based on the essence of government competition behavior,the competitive modes are divided into three categories:input competition,protection competition and institutional competition.Through the inter-provincial panel data of China's Mainland from 1997 to 2020,the impact of government competitive modes and specific strategy combination on regional development quality is empirically studied.The results show that input competition has both positive and negative effects on high-quality development,protection competition is not conducive to improving development quality,while institutional competition has the strongest improving effect on development quality.The results are robust after replacing the proxy variables.The research using interaction effect and strategy combination dummy variables shows that there is substitution effect between different competitive strategies,which belongs to the same mode.The strategy combination from different modes will weaken the quality effect of the single policy,but the combination of public services and simplification of administration and decentralization is conducive to high-quality development.

关 键 词：政府竞争 发展质量 全要素生产率 策略组合 竞争模式 

分 类 号：F812.7[经济管理—财政学] F207F064.1