违法相对论视角下知假买假行为定性研究  

Qualitative Research on Knowing and Buying Fake Behavior from the Perspective of Relativism of Violation of Law

作　　者：申胜威 SHEN Sheng-wei(School of Criminal Law,East China University of Politics and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《汉江师范学院学报》2024年第4期79-86,共8页Journal of Hanjiang Normal University

基　　金：华东政法大学2023年苏惠渔刑法学研究基金资助(项目编号:2023-15)。

摘　　要：在考察知假买假行为的刑法定性时,应当坚持以违法相对论为判断前提,将民事权利的有无纳入具体构成要件的分析中。在对行为进行入罪判断时,应当注意排除非构成要件的影响。非法占有目的的非法性来源是民事权利的缺失,敲诈勒索客观行为的成立应当考虑手段自身的违法性。消费者在食品、药品领域知假买假仍然具有索赔的权利,举报、向媒体曝光的手段本身也不具有违法性,因此知假买假行为原则上不成立敲诈勒索罪。In examining the criminal law characterization of the act of knowing and buying counterfeits,the relativistic theory of lawbreaking should be adhered to as the prerequisite for judgment,and the presence or absence of civil rights should be included in the analysis of specific constituent elements.When making a determination of criminal liability for an act,it is important to exclude the influence of non-constitutive elements.The source of illegality of the purpose of illegal possession is the absence of civil rights,and the establishment of the objective behavior of extortion should take into account the illegality of the means itself.Consumers in the field of food and drugs know fake still have the right to claim,report,expose to the media means itself is not illegal,so knowing and buying fake behavior in principle does not establish the crime of extortion.

关 键 词：知假买假 敲诈勒索罪 违法相对论 行为无价值 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学] D9222.294[政治法律—法学]