清代骈文文道论  

Wen Dao Theory of Parallel Prose in the Qing Dynasty

作　　者：王正刚 唐荣钊 WANG Zhenggang;TANG Rongzhao(School of Culture and Communication,Guangxi Science&Technology Normal University,Laibin 541699,China)

机构地区：[1]广西科技师范学院文化与传播学院,广西来宾541699

出　　处：《广西科技师范学院学报》2024年第3期45-53,共9页Journal of Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University

基　　金：2021年国家社科基金西部项目“清代骈文集序跋文献整理与研究”(21XZW039);2022年广西科技师范学院大学生科研基金项目“壮族文人郑献甫骈文研究”(GXKS2022DXSA002)。

摘　　要：骈文文道关系是骈文文论的基点之一,是其文章价值重要旨归之一。在清代骈文集中,不少序跋从哲学史、思想史、文学史角度立论,回答骈文的来源、特质、功用等问题,其核心是“道”与“文”的关系。本研究从道之本原、骈文源出于道、骈体之道和文道并重四个角度论述清代骈文中文与道的关系,并指出骈文不应该成为言道、载道的桎梏,而应成为助力。The relationship between parallel prose and Dao is one of the fundamental points of parallel prose theory,and it is one of the important values of its writing.In the collection of parallel prose in the Qing Dynasty,many prefaces and postscripts discuss the origin,characteristics,and functions of parallel prose from the perspectives of philosophical history,intellectual history,and literary history,with the core being the relationship between“Dao”and“Wen”.This article discusses the relationship between Chinese and Taoism in Qing Dynasty parallel prose from four perspectives:the origin of Dao,the origin of parallel prose from Taoism,the dual emphasis on prose and Taoism.Parallel prose should not be a shackle for expressing and carrying Dao,but should be its assistance.

关 键 词：清代 骈文 文道论 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]