检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王富宁 杨晨 张小玉 张敏 王子楠[2,3] 杜娟 WANG Funing;YANG Chen;ZHANG Xiaoyu;ZHANG Min;WANG Zinan;DU Juan(Digital Twin Research Center,Institute of Engineering Thermophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;Advanced Gas Turbine Laboratory,Institute of Engineering Thermophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Light-Duty Gas-Turbine,Beijing 100190,China;School of Aeronautics and Astronautics,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 101408,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院工程热物理研究所数字孪生研究中心,北京100190 [2]中国科学院工程热物理研究所先进燃气轮机实验室,北京100190 [3]轻型涡轮动力全国重点实验室,北京100190 [4]中国科学院大学航空宇航学院,北京101408
出 处:《工程热物理学报》2024年第9期2612-2621,共10页Journal of Engineering Thermophysics
基 金:国家重大科技专项(No.Y2019-I-0002-0003);国家重大科技专项(No.J2019-II-0017-0038);国家重大科技专项(No.2017-0004-0017)。
摘 要:为理清不同数值缩放方法特点,发展适用于多级高压比压气机的燃气涡轮发动机混合维度仿真算法,针对某型分轴式燃气轮机及其17级压气机,分别基于弱耦合、常规迭代耦合、完全耦合、以及本文提出的改进迭代耦合方法建立了耦合整机零维模型与压气机通流模型的整机混合维度仿真模型。对比分析不同数值缩放方法的差异,结果表明,弱耦合、迭代耦合与完全耦合方法基本可实现相同的计算精度,与试验数据的最大相对误差小于10%。其中,弱耦合方法易于收敛,其计算精度与计算效率受特性图质量等因素影响;常规迭代耦合方法计算效率虽高,但其鲁棒性在多级高压比压气机的数值缩放中难以保证;完全耦合方法计算效率较低,且对求解算法与迭代变量初值要求较高;而改进迭代耦合方法有效利用了17级压气机压比范围宽的特点,兼具鲁棒性与计算效率,整体表现最佳。In order to clarify the characteristics of different zooming strategies,and develop the algorithm of gas turbine hybrid-dimensional simulation for multistage compressor with high pressure ratio.For a split-shaft gas turbine and its 17-stage compressor,the hybrid-dimensional simulation models that coupled zero-dimensional engine model and compressor through-flow model were developed based on the De-coupled approach,conventional iterative coupled approach,fully coupled approach,and the improved iterative coupled approach proposed in this paper respectively.The variations of different zooming strategies were compared and analyzed,the results indicate that the De-coupled approach,iterative coupled approach and fully coupled approach can basically achieve the same simulation accuracy,the maximum relative error between simulation result and experimental data is less than 10%.Moreover,the De-coupled approach tends to converge easily,its simulation accuracy and efficiency are affected by factors such as the quality of characteristic map.Although the conventional iterative coupled approach exhibits high simulation efficiency,its robustness is difficult to guarantee in the zooming of multistage compressor with high pressure ratio.The fully coupled approach has relatively low simulation efficiency and high requirements for both the solving algorithm and the initial value of iterative variables.Meanwhile,the improved iterative coupled approach effectively utilizes the wide pressure ratio range of the 17-stage compressor,exhibiting both high robustness and high simulation efficiency,the effect is optimal.
关 键 词:燃气涡轮发动机 总体性能 混合维度仿真 数值缩放方法 压气机通流模型
分 类 号:TK472.6[动力工程及工程热物理—动力机械及工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49