图书馆衍生数据的权利确证、保护困境及路径选择  

Right Confirmation,Protection Dilemma,and Path Selection of Library Derived Data

作　　者：朱瑞 Zhu Rui

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学公共法律服务学院

出　　处：《图书馆建设》2024年第4期47-57,共11页Library Development

摘　　要：当前,法律对图书馆数据利用的保护和激励不足。《个人信息保护法》从读者信息保护的角度强调图书馆的数据处理者义务,这导致与读者信息相关的数据利用制度的缺位和图书馆衍生数据保护的不足。人工智能和大数据的结合形成图书馆衍生数据的财产利益。现有研究从读者信息保护的角度未能完整构建图书馆衍生数据的法治保护方案,司法实践不得已采用反不正当竞争的保护路径,但这些路径在实践和理论上都引起反弹。更为完善的路径是将图书馆衍生数据挂靠在《民法典》第127条数据财产保护的准用条款之中,进而通过《民法典》第123条保持开放姿态的知识产权保护条款,细化图书馆衍生数据权能的实质内容,最终形成完整的保护路径。Currently,the legal protection and incentives for library data utilization are insufficient.The Personal Information Protection Law emphasizes the obligation of data processors in libraries from the perspective of reader information protection,which leads to the absence of data utilization systems related to reader information and insufficient protection of library derived data.The combination of artificial intelligence and big data forms the property benefits of library derived data.Existing research has failed to fully construct a legal protection plan for library derived data from the perspective of reader information protection.Judicial practice has had to adopt anti unfair competition protection paths,but these paths have encountered strong backlash in both practice and theory.A more comprehensive approach is to include library derived data in the applicable provisions of Article 127 of the Civil Code for data property protection,and then refine the substantive content of library derived data rights through the open intellectual property protection provisions of Article 123 of the Civil Code,ultimately forming a complete protection path.

关 键 词：衍生数据 图书馆数据保护 图书馆财产 

分 类 号：G250.7[文化科学—图书馆学] G203