检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李志明[1] 毕林丰 Li Zhiming;Bi Linfeng
机构地区:[1]中央党校(国家行政学院)社会和生态文明教研部,北京100089
出 处:《江西社会科学》2024年第7期167-176,208,共11页Jiangxi Social Sciences
摘 要:西方社会对贫困问题的关注由来已久,提出的贫困治理策略也是纷繁复杂、多种多样。在前现代时期,贫困治理手段经历了从古希腊—古罗马时期的训诫、驱逐方式,到中世纪的教会和政府济贫,再到启蒙运动后的强迫劳动、发展经济;进入现代社会,学界基于资源要素论、能力权利论、文化心理论等不同视角开出了各种贫困治理药方。纵观西方贫困治理话语的历时性演变可以发现,消减贫困,若良医疗病。病万变,药亦万变,皆因时度势而变。中国在以往反贫困实践中参考吸收了西方贫困治理话语中的有益成果,后小康时代这种学习借鉴也仍将继续。Western societies have long been concerned with the issue of poverty,proposing a variety of complex and diverse strategies for poverty governance.In the pre-modern era,poverty governance methods evolved from admonishment and expulsion in ancient Greece and Rome,to charitable relief by the church and government in the Middle Ages,and then to forced labor and economic development following the Enlightenment.Upon entering modern society,scholars have offered various prescriptions for poverty governance from different perspectives,such as resource-based theories,capability and rights theories and cultural psychology theories.Through observing the diachronic evolution of Western poverty governance discourse,it reveals that alleviating poverty is akin to treating an illness:as the illness changes,so too must the medicine,adapting to the circumstances of the time.China has historically referenced and absorbed beneficial elements from Western poverty governance discourse in its anti-poverty practices,and this process of learning and adaptation will continue in the post well-off era.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49