油印本修复技法比较——以《中西药物功用异同》的修复为例  

Comparative Analysis of Mimeograph Book Restoration Techniques:A Case Study on the Restoration of “The Differences andSimilarities of Chinese and Western Medicine”

作　　者：傅杰如 FU Jie-ru(Fujian Normal University Library,Fuzhou 350000,China)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学图书馆,福建福州350000

出　　处：《造纸技术与应用》2024年第3期23-29,共7页Paper Technology & Application

基　　金：云南省“兴滇英才支持计划”青年人才专项项目(编号C619300A104)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：以油印本《中西药物功用异同》为研究对象,对传统手工修复、现代纸浆补书机技术以及传统手工托裱三种常见文献修复技法进行比较分析。通过对应用三种技法修复后书叶的平整度、厚度、酸碱度及修复效率方面进行评估和对比,提出了各种修复技法优缺点和适用范围。建议在实际修复中根据具体情况选择合适技法或综合运用多种技法。本研究可为油印本及其他古籍文献的修复工作提供参考和借鉴。This study focuses on the mimeograph book“The Differences and Similarities of Chinese and Western Medicine”to compare three common document restoration techniques:traditional manual restoration,modern leafcasting technique and traditional manual mounting.By evaluating and comparing the flatness,thickness,pH value,and repair efficiency of the book leaves restored using these three techniques,this research identifies the advantages,disadvantages,and applicable scope of each method.It is recommended to select appropriate techniques or combine multiple techniques based on specific circumstances in actual restoration work.This study provides valuable references for the restoration of mimeograph books and other ancient documents.

关 键 词：油印本修复 修复技法 传统手工修复 现代纸浆补书机技术 传统手工托裱 

分 类 号：G264.3[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学] TS76[轻工技术与工程—制浆造纸工程]