儿童色情制品单纯持有行为入罪化之检视  

Examination of the Criminalization of the Solitary Possession of Child Pornography

作　　者：皇平平 高效吉 Huang Pingping;Gao Xiaoji(ZhaoQing University,Zhaoqing 526060,China;The People's Procuratorate of Suqian,Anqing 246500,China)

机构地区：[1]肇庆学院政法学院,广东肇庆526060 [2]安徽省安庆市宿松县人民检察院,安徽安庆246500

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2024年第4期89-100,共12页Journal of Hubei University of Police

基　　金：国家社科基金后期项目“数据安全立体刑法保护机制研究”(23FFXB027);教育部人文社会科学研究项目——青年项目“总体国家安全观视域下网络犯罪协同治理模式研究”(23YJC820002)。

摘　　要：通过刑事立法规制儿童色情制品犯罪责任链“顶端”的制作行为和“中间”的传播行为,基本已获共识,但处于责任链“底端”的单纯持有行为的可罚性则存在疑问。主张单纯持有行为入罪的可罚性根据包括市场理论、引诱理论、倾向理论和隐私理论,通过对入罪理由的检视和反思,可以发现单纯持有行为与儿童性虐待之间的规范性因果关系模糊且不确定,将其入罪可能导致刑法面临“越界”风险和“过载”风险。通过行政处罚及相关配套措施规制单纯持有行为,可在坚守刑法谦抑性和最后手段性的同时,预防和阻止儿童性虐待行为的发生。It has been widely recognized through criminal legislation that the production behavior at the“top”of the responsibility chain for child pornography crimes and the dissemination behavior in the"middle"have been regulated.However,there are doubts about the punitive nature of personal possession behavior at the“bottom”of the responsibility chain.The criminalization of personal possession behavior is based on market theory,inducement theory,propensity theory,and privacy theory.Through examination and reflection on the reasons for criminalization,it can be found that the normative causal relationship between personal possession behavior and child sexual abuse is vague and uncertain.Criminalizing it may lead to the risk of“crossing boundaries”and“overload”in criminal law.By implementing administrative penalties and related supporting measures to regulate personal possession behavior,it is possible to prevent and prevent the occurrence of child sexual abuse while adhering to the modesty and last resort nature of criminal law.

关 键 词：儿童色情制品 单纯持有行为 儿童性虐待 隐私权 刑法谦抑性 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]