检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚念辛 叶晓川 Yao Nianxin;Ye Xiaochuan(Graduate School,People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100000;School of Law,People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100000)
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学研究生院,北京100000 [2]中国人民公安大学法学院,北京100000
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第17期109-112,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:近些年光污染侵权案件频发,我国环境法对光污染宽泛笼统、概括性的规定存在一定局限性,光污染防治专门立法缺位弊端日益凸显,多数光污染侵权案件中受害者在寻求救济时缺少精准的法律适用依据以及相应认定标准,进而使举证困难,增大了败诉风险。光污染侵权行为的认定应结合公众可容忍度与客观科学标准,司法办案应坚持环境法社会公益价值取向,立法层面应建立和完善光污染防治的单行法规及其相关防治制度,为光污染侵权案件裁判提供有效的解决思路。In recent years,light pollution tort cases have occurred frequently,and China’s environmental law has certain limitations on the broad and general provisions of light pollution,and the defects of the absence of special legislation on light pollution prevention and control are increasingly prominent,in most light pollution tort cases,the victims lack the accurate legal application basis and the corresponding determination standards when seeking relief,which makes it difficult to prove and increases the risk of losing the case.The determination of light pollution torts should be combined with public tolerance and objective scientific standards,the judicial case should adhere to the social public welfare value orientation of environmental law,and the legislative level should establish and improve the prevention and control of light pollution and its related prevention and control system,in order to provide effective solutions for the adjudication of light pollution tort cases.
关 键 词:光污染 光污染侵权行为 公众可容忍度 环境侵权责任
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49