检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙莹 禹政远 Sun Ying;Yu Zhengyuan(Civil and Commercial Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出 处:《科技与法律(中英文)》2024年第5期25-36,共12页Science Technology and Law(Chinese-English Version)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“企业数据确权和流转中的登记问题研究”(23BFX075);重庆市哲学社会科学规划项目一般项目“大规模侵害个人信息损害赔偿责任的实体与程序研究”。
摘 要:围绕数据权益保护,有权利保护模式和行为规制模式之分。但两种模式是否截然二分,以反不正当竞争法为代表的行为规制模式是否存在数据赋权的可能性,都值得再思考。司法实践中,竞争关系认定已经趋于泛化,其不适宜再被定位为实体要件或起诉条件。对不正当竞争行为的判定重心应由“竞争关系”转向“竞争秩序”,由此竞争法上数据权益便获得了一定程度的对世性。权利和利益的分野并不在其采取的保护模式,而在其是否契合权益区分的法教义学标准。只要归属效能和排除效能清晰到获得社会典型公开性的程度,行为规制模式亦可实现权利化。鉴于当今司法实践主要通过反不正当竞争法保护数据权益,凝聚两种模式的共识,以行为规制权利化路径落地数据产权结构性分置,或许是为一条可行路径。In the realm of protecting data rights and interests,there is a distinction between the pattern of rights protec⁃tion and the pattern of behavior regulation.However,it is worth reconsidering whether these two patterns are strictly di⁃chotomous and whether the pattern of behavior regulation,as represented by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law,holds the potential for data empowerment.In judicial practice,the determination of competitive relationship has become so generalized that it is no longer suitable as a substantive requirement or a condition for litigation.The determination of unfair competition should shift its focus from"competitive relationship"to"competitive order",thereby granting data rights and interests a certain degree of universality under the Competition Law.The differentiation between rights and interests does not lie in the pattern of protection adopted,but rather in whether it meets the three legal criteria for dis⁃tinguishing rights from interests.As long as the allocation function and exclusion function are sufficiently clear to achieve a level of typical social obviousness,even the pattern of behavior regulation can realize the transformation from interests to rights.Given that current judicial practice primarily protects data rights and interests through the Anti-Unfair Competition Law,integrating the consensus of both patterns then achieving the structural separation of data property rights through the path of making behavioral regulation as the right may be a feasible path.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15