基于编辑视角的临床研究论文的常见问题及对策  

Common problems and countermeasures in clinical research papers from an editorial perspective

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:周旦 匡静之 禹纯顺 ZHOU Dan;KUANG Jingzhi;YU Chunshun(Periodical Press of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,Changsha,Hunan 410208,China)

机构地区:[1]湖南中医药大学期刊杂志社,湖南长沙410208

出  处:《湖南中医药大学学报》2024年第9期1693-1698,共6页Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine

基  金:湖南省培育世界一流湘版科技期刊建设工程项目(湘科计[2023]27号)。

摘  要:临床研究论文是临床研究的成果展示,其质量反映临床研究的科学性、规范性及结果的准确性。作为临床医学编辑,笔者在审稿、编校临床研究论文的过程中发现了较多问题,总结为研究内容的伦理问题、研究对象的选择问题、研究方法的采用问题、治疗方法的合理性问题、结局指标的严谨性问题、研究结果分析的全面性问题。结合临床研究论文编校工作经验,从编辑视角针对以上问题提出强化临床伦理及参考标准的规范性、查验研究方法的科学性、核实研究结果及结论的严谨性3个对策,旨在帮助提高临床医生论文撰写水平及医学编辑初审、编校临床研究论文水平。A clinical research paper is the presentation of the clinical research results,and its quality reflects the scientificity and standardization of the research,and the accuracy of the results.As a clinical medical editor,the author has identified numerous problems during the editing and proofreading processes of clinical research papers,which involve the aspects of ethics in research content,selection of research subjects,adoption of research methods,rationality of treatment methods,rigor of outcome indicators,and comprehensiveness of research result analysis.Based on the experience in editing and proofreading clinical research papers,this paper proposes three countermeasures from an editorial perspective to address the above problems:improving the standardization of clinical ethics and reference criteria,ensuring the scientificity of research methods,and verifying the rigor of research results and conclusions,so as to help improve the paper-writing proficiency of clinical doctors,as well as the skills of initial review,editing,and proofreading of medical editors for clinical research papers.

关 键 词:编辑 论文撰写 临床研究 规范化 问题分析 

分 类 号:R2[医药卫生—中医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象