检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张智雄[1,2,3] 王玉菊 赵旸[1,3] ZHANG Zhixiong;WANG Yuju;ZHAO Yang(National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190;Department of Information Resources Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190;Key Laboratory of New Publishing and Knowledge Services for Scholarly Journals,Beijing 100190)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院文献情报中心,北京100190 [2]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京100190 [3]国家新闻出版署学术期刊新型出版与知识服务重点实验室,北京100190
出 处:《农业图书情报学报》2024年第5期14-22,共9页Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“预印本学术交流的理论和实践研究”(19BTQ006)。
摘 要:[目的/意义]梳理分析国际开放同行评审平台的基本模式与发展趋势,探讨国际开放同行评审平台对中国学术交流和科研治理的启示。[方法/过程]文章首先概述了国际开放同行评审平台的3种基本运营模式,之后通过对这些平台和社区发展动态的深入分析,归纳总结了其发展趋势。在此基础上,结合国际经验与中国科研环境的具体特点,提出了针对中国开放开放同行评审(平台)建设的建议。[结果/结论]国际开放同行评审平台和社区正逐步成为推动科研创新、提升科研质量的重要力量。针对中国现状,文章提出加快建设国际开放同行评审平台和社区的6条建议,包括加强政策引导与制度支持,更新科技出版理念,鼓励案例示范,建设国家开放同行评审基础设施等,以抢占国际学术交流的新阵地。[Purpose/Significance]This study systematically analyzes the basic models and development trends of international open peer review platforms,with the aim of exploring the insights these platforms provide for academic communication and research governance in China.The goal is to accelerate the establishment and development of an open peer review system in China,fostering a more open,collaborative,and efficient academic exchange environment that promotes the free flow of knowledge and the widespread dissemination of scientific ideas.[Method/Process]The article first reviews and analyzes several international open peer review platforms and communities that are led by the scientific community and operate independently of scientific journal publishing,such as Peer Community In(PCI),Sciety,PREreview,and Review Commons.On this basis,it outlines the basic operational models of international open peer review platforms and identifies a number of common features among the three basic models.Then,through an in-depth analysis of the development dynamics of these platforms and communities,the study summarizes their development trends from different perspectives,including research institutions,scientists,scientific community,and international academic communication models.Based on this analysis,and taking into account international experience and the specific characteristics of China's research environment,the article proposes recommendations for building an open peer review system in China.[Results/Conclusions]The study identifies three basic operational models of international open peer review platforms:platforms established for the purpose of open publishing,platforms developed primarily as preprint servers,and platforms built independently for open peer review.It also summarizes the key trends in the development of these platforms:strong support from major research institutions,active participation of leading scientists,the formation and impact of large-scale platforms,recognition of open peer-reviewed research by the scien
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222