检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:房俊杰 辛昕[1] Fang Junjie;Xin Xin(Air Force Engineering University,Xi’an 710051)
出 处:《智库理论与实践》2024年第4期131-140,共10页Think Tank:Theory & Practice
摘 要:[目的/意义]对美国智库报告进行分析,有助于分析研判美国对华军事人工智能战略的认知,为中国采取应对措施提供一定建议。[方法/过程]本文选取美国6家智库的20份文献作为样本,采用文献分析法对所选文献进行分析,梳理美国智库对华军事人工智能的认知及其特点、成因和影响。[结果/结论]美国智库将中国发展军事人工智能视为一种威胁,并建议通过多种手段对中国采取遏制措施,但部分智库考虑到未来人工智能领域的军事应用存在不确定性,仍期望与中国合作,减少未来风险。对此,中国应加强自身能力建设,为未来的智能化战争做好充分准备;促进国际交流合作,推动人工智能军事应用和平发展与安全利用;加强国际舆论导向,增进国际社会对中国的理解和认知。[Purpose/Significance]Analyzing American think tank reports can aid in accessing the recognition of the United States towards China’s artificial intelligence strategies,thereby offering suggestions for China’s countermeasures.[Method/Process]By using the literature analysis method,the paper selects 20 documents from 6 think tanks in the United States as samples,and summarizes their main recognition of China’s military artificial intelligence,including their characteristics,motivations,and influence.[Result/Conclusion]American think tanks generally view China’s development of military artificial intelligence as a threat,recommending various containment measures against China.Nonetheless,some think tanks,recognizing the uncertainties in the future military applications in the field of artificial intelligence,still advocate for cooperation with China to mitigate future risks.In this regard,China should strengthen its own capabilities to prepare for future intelligent warfare,promote international exchanges and cooperation to boost the development and utilization of military artificial intelligence in a peaceful and safe way,and strengthen the correct orientation of international public opinion to enhance the international community’s understanding and cognition of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7