数字时代的“表达”:算法推荐的信息干预及其法治化因应  

Expression in the Digital Age:Information Intervention of Algorithmic Recommendation and Its Legalization Response

作　　者：秦前红[1] 王雨亭 QIN Qianhong;WANG Yuting

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]中南大学法学院

出　　处：《法治研究》2024年第5期42-52,共11页Research on Rule of Law

基　　金：研究阐释党的十九届六中全会精神国家社会科学基金重大项目“新时代党和国家监督体系完善研究”(项目编号:22ZDA040)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：算法正位于生活的中心,算法推荐服务所带来的隐性信息干预隐含着侵蚀表达自由的风险。数字时代“表达”的结构已发生更迭,保护“表达”所依赖的信息基础尤为重要。算法推荐领域保护“表达”的二阶规范渊源分别为契约与立法,契约责任面临有限的意思自治与公法属性权利让渡的悖论,走向“算法治理”的立法规制则面临执行的困境。宪法基本权利第三人效力及我国社会主义性质宪法“合作的基本权利”结构为宪法基本权利条款的介入提供了法理依据。宪法为划定政府、平台责任边界提供根本依据,宪法基本权利条款的新内涵能够指导规则体系的生成及运行,有利于形成统一的法秩序。将算法推荐规则纳入合宪性审查、备案审查的制度体系内,能够实现平台权力与国家权力的衔接统合。Our lives depend on algorithms everywhere,and algorithmic recommendations implicitly threaten freedom of expression.Freedom of expression in the algorithmic era should focus on protecting the information base.The normative sources of freedom of expression in the field of algorithmic recommendation include contractual responsibility and regulations,contractual responsibility has problems such as untruthfulness of consent,and regulations face difficulties in implementation.The third-party effect of the fundamental rights and the socialist nature of our country provides a legal basis for the intervention of the constitutional fundamental rights provisions,and the constitution should assume the role of distributing responsibility and forming a unified order.We should use the new connotation of the fundamental rights provisions to guide the establishment of the rule system,and include algorithms into constitutionality reviews.

关 键 词：算法推荐 表达自由 通信自由 算法治理 平台权力 

分 类 号：D922.17[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D922.16[政治法律—法学] TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程]