检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐瑞 XU Rui(School of Law,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 102400,China)
出 处:《宜春学院学报》2024年第8期31-35,47,共6页Journal of Yichun University
摘 要:作为现代刑罚规范结构组成部分的资格刑,在刑罚轻型化的趋势下具有重要价值,发挥资格刑效用是刑事治理现代化转型的需求。审视我国立法,资格刑存在内容设置失当、类型单一、主体片面、体系性缺乏的问题,难以回应我国经济社会发展的需要,也与我国轻罪立法趋势不相适应。应当对资格刑实体规范进行体系化建设以及结构优化,对剥夺政治权利内容进行合理取舍、增设从业禁止的刑罚措施、将单位犯罪纳入惩治体系,完善我国资格刑制度。As a part of the normative structure of modern penalty,qualification penalty has important value under the trend of lighter penalty.It is the demand of the modernization transformation of criminal governance to give full play to the utility of qualification penalty.It is difficult to respond to the needs of our economic and social development,and it does not fit in with the legislative trend of misdemeanor crime.It is necessary to systemize the entity norms of qualification punishment and optimize the structure,make a reasonable choice of the content of deprivation of political rights,add penalty measures to prohibit employment,incorporate unit crimes into the punishment system,and perfect the system of qualification punishment in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158