“村规-村建-村管”联动的乡村建设路径探索——以浙江省余村乡村共同缔造实验为例  

RURAL CONSTRUCTION PATH BASED ON THE LINKAGE OF VILLAGE PLANNING,VILLAGE CONSTRUCTION,AND VILLAGE MANAGEMENT:A CASE STUDY OF RURAL CO-CREATION EXPERIMENT AT YUCUN VILLAGE IN ZHEJIANG PROVINCE

作　　者：刘迪[1] LIU Di

机构地区：[1]中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院

出　　处：《城市规划》2024年第9期57-66,共10页City Planning Review

摘　　要：历史上长期的城乡二元制度,使得城与乡在土地使用和行政运行机制等方面存在巨大差异,使得我国在城镇建设中取得的巨大成功与经验难以复制到乡村建设领域。掺杂有城市规划思维烙印的村庄规划长期存在不实用、不适用,以及与村庄建设、村庄运营维护管理脱节的问题。通过对比乡村建设与城市建设的模式差异,以共同缔造理念为依托,在学界已有实践认知的基础上,提出围绕事权主体的“实用性”村庄规划、基于村民主体需求的“内生型”乡村建设行动和面向多元主体参与的“自治型”村规民约。按照“村规、村建、村管”的共同缔造路径,提出乡村建设的全过程治理策略,并以浙江省余村村庄规划为实验案例,对全过程治理策略进行了实证分析。The long-standing urban-rural dual structure in China has resulted in significant differences in land use and administrative operating mechanisms between urban and rural areas,making it difficult for China to replicate the successes and experience gained from urban construction in rural construction.The village planning that bears the imprint of urban planning thought has long proven impractical,inappropriate,and disjointed from village construction,operation,and management.Drawing on the concept of co-creation and grounded in the existing practical understanding in the academic community,this paper compares the differences between rural construction and urban construction models,and proposes“practical”village planning that centers around entities responsible for local affairs,“endogenous”village construction actions based on villagers’needs,and“autonomous”village regulations and agreements formulated with the participation of multiple stakeholders.It further proposes an entire-process governance strategy for rural construction that hinges on the co-creation path encompassing“village planning,village construction,and village management”,and substantiates the strategy based on an empirical study of the planning for Yucun Village in Zhejiang Province.

关 键 词：共同缔造 乡村振兴 村庄规划 乡村建设 余村 村规民约 

分 类 号：TU982.29[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]