基于自然解决方案的中欧城市森林建设实践对比分析——以中国北京与比利时布鲁塞尔为例  

A Comparative Analysis of Urban Forest Practices Based on Nature-Based Solutions Between China and the EU:A Case Study of Beijing in China and Brussels in Belgium

作　　者：赵佳佳 张新娜[1] 徐程扬[1] Zhao Jiajia;Zhang Xinna;Xu Chengyang(The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Forest Ecosystem of National Forestry and Grassland Administration/Research Center for Urban Forestry,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China)

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学城市林业研究中心森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室干旱半干旱地区森林培育及生态系统研究国家林草局重点实验室,北京100083

出　　处：《中国城市林业》2024年第4期11-18,共8页Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry

基　　金：国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFE0193200-3);北京林业大学“5·5工程”科研创新团队项目(BLRC2023B06)。

摘　　要：基于NBS和UF-NBS的理论基础,选取中国北京与比利时布鲁塞尔作为案例城市进行比较分析,为更大范围的NBS和UF-NBS本土化应用奠定基础。结果表明:由于自然条件的差异,北京的城市森林建设多以恢复生态系统为目的,实施大规模造林项目;布鲁塞尔UF-NBS项目则侧重于生物多样性保护。在治理方面,北京市采用以政府为主导,各相关部门分散、联动的管理模式;布鲁塞尔则是以城市规划者和公民参与为基础的复杂管理体系,公众参与度相对较高。因此,北京的大规模城市森林建设经验为布鲁塞尔提供了有效参考;布鲁塞尔在公众参与方面的经验值得我国借鉴,我国应进一步提高公民对UF-NBS的接受度与认可度,鼓励公民参与和监督UF-NBS规划设计、构建、经营管护到更新的全过程,使城市森林建设成为全社会的公共事业。We explored the application of NBS and UF-NBS through a comparative analysis of Beijing in China and Brussels in Belgium,aiming to lay a foundation for the localized application of NBS and UF-NBS in a broader range.The main findings indicate that due to the difference in natural conditions,Beijing prioritizes the large-scale afforestation projects in urban forest development,with the focus on ecosystem restoration,while Brussels puts the focus on biodiversity conservation in its UF-NBS project.In terms of governance,Beijing adopts the government leading governance characterized with interconnected joint actions of various authorities,while Brussels employs a complex governance system that involves urban planners and citizens,with relatively high public participation.In this sense,China's experience in large-scale urban forest establishment could provide an effective reference for Brussels,but need to learn from Brussels'experience in public participation.China should further improve citizens'recognition and acceptance of UF-NBS,and encouraging citizens to participate in and supervise the entire process of UF-NBS planning,design,construction,management,protection and renewal.This would help make urban forest development a public social endeavor.

关 键 词：基于自然的解决方案 城市森林建设 案例研究 对比分析 

分 类 号：S731.2[农业科学—林学]