生态环境法典视域下环境刑事责任的实现  

On the Realization of Environmental Criminal Responsibility under the Vision of Ecological Environmental Code

作　　者：冯瀚元 Feng Hanyuan(Civil,Commercial and Economic Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院

出　　处：《江苏大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第5期42-55,共14页Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(202407070042)。

摘　　要：我国环境刑事立法经历了从分散立法到统一立法的历史变迁,恢复性司法理念在环境刑事司法实践中得到深入贯彻。环境刑事立法模式存在单一法典论与分散立法论之争,症结在于法典化与解法典化的二律背反,应以功能主义的进路应对。基于外部功效和内部功能的考量,环境刑事立法应在总体上延续统一刑法典模式,但不宜在刑法典中规定生态修复责任。为了适应环境刑事司法的发展,考虑到生态修复责任是环境法所特有的责任形式,应在生态环境法典中的刑事责任转致条款中规定生态修复责任,在刑事责任体系中的性质应界定为非刑罚处罚措施。The environmental criminal legislation of China has undergone the historical change from decentralized legislation to unified legislation,and the idea of restorative justice has been thoroughly carried out in the practice of environmental criminal justice.There is a dispute between the theory of single code and the theory of decentralized legislation in environmental criminal legislation mode because of the antinomy between codification and de-codification,which must be approached from the functionalist way.Based on the consideration of external efficacy and internal function,environmental criminal legislation should continue the unified criminal code model in general,but it is improper to stipulate ecological restoration responsibility in the criminal code.As ecological restoration responsibility is a unique form of environmental law responsibility,ecological restoration responsibility should be stipulated in the criminal responsibility transfer clause of the eco-environmental code and the nature of the criminal responsibility system should be defined as non-penalization measures to adapt to the development of environmental criminal justice.

关 键 词：生态环境法典 环境刑法 功能主义 刑事立法 生态修复责任 

分 类 号：D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]