检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋中楷 任亮 方意心 JIANG Zhongkai;REN Liang;FANG Yixin
机构地区:[1]同济大学道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,上海2018042 [2]上海市城乡建设和交通发展研究院,上海200032
出 处:《上海公路》2024年第3期11-14,54,M0003,共6页Shanghai Highways
摘 要:机场道面在飞机荷载与外界环境侵扰的综合影响下,其服役性能会逐渐衰减,进而引起结构风险上升,影响飞机的地面运行安全与飞行效率。国内机场以刚性道面为主,为评估机场刚性道面结构风险,采用层次分析法,确定了地基沉降、地基反应模量、PCN(Pavement Classification Number)与板底脱空4个关键指标的权重,提出了结构风险综合评价指标RPRI,给出了风险指标缺项工况下RPRI的计算方法,确定了结构风险的评价阈值,并进一步以上海浦东国际机场与天府国际机场为案例,展示了机场刚性道面结构风险评价方法。The operational performance of airport pavement deteriorates gradually under combined impacts of aircraft loads and environmental factors,leading to increasing structural risk and compromising the safety and efficiency of aircraft ground operations.Rigid pavements are predominant in China.To assess the structural risk of airport rigid pavements,the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)was employed to determine the weights of key indicators,including foundation settlement,foundation reaction modulus,PCN(Pavement Classification Number)and void beneath slab.The study proposed RPRI,a comprehensive evaluation index of structural risk,developed a calculation method,and determined the threshold value of structural risk evaluation.Finally,the methodology for assessing structural risk in rigid airport pavements was illustrated taking Shanghai Pudong International Airport and Chengdu Tianfu International Airport as examples.
分 类 号:V351.11[航空宇航科学与技术—人机与环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7