侵权法的矫正正义与分配正义互补论  

The Complementary Theory of Corrective Justice and Distributive Justice in Tort Law

作　　者：韩非彤 HAN Feitong(Law of School,Jilin University,Changchun 130000,China)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,长春130000

出　　处：《重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第5期10-18,31,共10页Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点基地重大项目“推进新时代中国特色社会主义法学学术体系构建研究”(22JJD820001)。

摘　　要：面对纷繁复杂的社会现实,矫正正义或最佳威慑的单一理论对侵权法的解释已显局促。更多学者认同侵权法具有多种功能并受多种理论支配,如何协调不同价值之间的关系成为其中关键问题。英格拉德将量子力学哲学基础上的互补性观念引入侵权法,从而将正义的连贯性重构为正义的互补性,主张矫正正义与分配正义应是互斥且互补的和谐状态。矫正正义与分配正义互补论存在中国哲学基础,能够为我国侵权法的法治现代化提供法理基础。Faced with the complex social reality,the interpretation of tort law has been limited by the single theory of corrective justice or optimal deterrence.More scholars agree that tort law has multiple functions and pluralistic theory,but how to coordinate the relationship between different values has become a key issue.Englard introduced the idea of complementary in the philosophical basis of quantum mechanics into tort law,thus reconstructing the coherence of justice into the complementary of justice,and advocating that corrective justice and distributive justice should be mutually exclusive and complementary harmony.The complementary theory of correctional justice and distributive justice is based on Chinese philosophy and can provide a legal basis for the legal modernization of tort law.

关 键 词：侵权法哲学 互补性 矫正正义 分配正义 阴阳哲学 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]