中国老年医学指南和共识的科学性、透明性和适用性评级  

Evaluation and ranking for scientific,transparent and applicable of Chinese Geriatrics guidelines and consensus

作　　者：李代萍 丁群芳[1] 曹立[1] 侯利莎 彭旭超 董碧蓉[1] 岳冀蓉[1] STAR工作组老年医学专科委员会 Li Daiping;Ding Qunfang;Cao Li;Hou Lisha;Peng Xuchao;Dong Birong;Yue Jirong;Representing the Specialized Committee for Geriatric Medicine of the STAR Workgroup(Department of Geriatrics and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics,West China Hospital of Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)

机构地区：[1]国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心/四川大学华西医院老年医学中心,成都610041

出　　处：《中华老年医学杂志》2024年第9期1137-1142,共6页Chinese Journal of Geriatrics

基　　金：四川省中央引导地方科技发展专项(2023ZYD0173)。

摘　　要：目的评价期刊发表的中国老年医学领域指南和共识的科学性、透明性和适用性。方法在8个主要的中英文数据库中对2022年中国学者发表的老年医学领域指南及共识进行检索。基于STAR评级工具对筛选出的指南及共识进行评级,并对评级结果进行分析。结果共纳入2部指南和19部专家共识。总分最高50.6分,最低9.0分,平均(29.6±13.1)分。共识的"共识方法"领域得分率最高为47.4%,"注册"领域得分率最低为0;指南的"共识方法"领域得分率最高为42.9%,"注册""计划书"和"其他"3个领域得分率最低为0。结论中国老年医学领域的指南和共识总体质量有待提升,需加强指南共识制定相关培训,纳入方法学学者,提高期刊发表门槛,努力提升指南和共识的科学性、透明性与适用性。ObjectiveThe study aimed to assess the scientific rigor,transparency,and practicality of Chinese geriatric medicine guidelines and consensus published in academic journals.MethodsA systematic search was conducted across 8 major Chinese and English databases to identify guidelines and consensus documents from Chinese scholars in 2022.ResultsThe selected documents were evaluated using the STAR rating tool,resulting in the inclusion of 2 guidelines and 19 expert consensuses.The total scores ranged from 9.0 to 50.6 points,with an average score of 29.6±13.1 points.The highest score rate in the'Consensus Methods’category of expert consensuses was 47.4%,while the lowest score rate in the'Registration’category was 0.For guidelines,the highest score rate in the'Consensus Methods’category was 42.9%,while the lowest score rates were observed in the'Registration’,'Plan’,and'Others’categories at 0.ConclusionsThe overall quality of geriatric medicine guidelines and consensus in China requires enhancement.There is a need to improve training in guideline consensus development,involve methodologists,elevate the standards for journal publication,and strive to enhance the scientific rigor,transparency,and practicality of guidelines and consensus documents.

关 键 词：老年医学 指南 共识 临床实践 评价 

分 类 号：R592[医药卫生—老年医学]