检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李洋 LI Yang(School of Marxism,Peking University,Beijing,100871,PRC)
出 处:《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》2024年第5期24-31,共8页Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“以中国式现代化推进中华民族伟大复兴”(22ZDA022)。
摘 要:面对欧洲国家现代化进程中呈现出的国家治理问题,马克思在其早期著作中围绕相关议题进行了逐渐深入的批判。《莱茵报》时期主要批判普鲁士官僚制度的治理缺陷,开始了对理性国家观的怀疑。经过克罗茨纳赫时期研究视野的时空拓展,以及在批判黑格尔法哲学中确立的立场和方法,到《德法年鉴》时期,马克思的批判由政治国家深入到市民社会领域,指出了私有制是资本主义国家治理的根本症结。马克思在不断深化的国家治理批判中,实现了向历史唯物主义思想方法的转换,理解这一过程对于剖析当下推进国家治理的理论与实践创新有重要启发意义。Marx made an in-depth critique in his early works when facing the problems of national governance presented in the process of modernization in European countries.During the period of Rheinische Zeitung,Marx mainly criticized the governance flaws of the Prussian bureaucratic system, which led him doubt about Hegel's view of rational state.When Marx lived in Kreuznach, he expanded his study vision, also established a position and method when he criticized Hegel's philosophy of right.In the period of editing the Deutsch-Franz-sische Jahrbücher,Marx's critique extended from political state to civil society, pointing out that private ownership was the fundamental crux of capitalist national governance.In Marx's continuous deepening critique of national governance, he achieved a transformation towards the method of historical materialism.Understanding this process is of great inspiration for analyzing the current theoretical and practical innovations in promoting national governance.
分 类 号:B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33